Textual Politics: Women Authors Rewrite the Enlightenment, 1790--1805
Hilger, Stephanie Mathilde
This item is only available for download by members of the University of Illinois community. Students, faculty, and staff at the U of I may log in with your NetID and password to view the item. If you are trying to access an Illinois-restricted dissertation or thesis, you can request a copy through your library's Inter-Library Loan office or purchase a copy directly from ProQuest.
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/87285
Description
Title
Textual Politics: Women Authors Rewrite the Enlightenment, 1790--1805
Author(s)
Hilger, Stephanie Mathilde
Issue Date
2003
Doctoral Committee Chair(s)
Blake, Nancy
Department of Study
Comparative Literature
Discipline
Comparative Literature
Degree Granting Institution
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Degree Name
Ph.D.
Degree Level
Dissertation
Keyword(s)
Literature, Romance
Language
eng
Abstract
This study discusses four British, French, and German women authors from the late eighteenth and the early nineteenth centuries who wrote novels and plays that responded quite explicitly to texts written earlier in the eighteenth century by major male writers. The choice of texts by Karoline von Gunderrode (Mahomed), Ellis Cornelia Knight (Dinarbas), Julie de Krudener (Valerie), and Helen Maria Williams (Julia) was triggered by the fact that, despite what appeared to be an interesting pattern of literary response, little critical interest had been devoted to these writings. I argue that the reason for this neglect lies in the fact that, at first sight, these women's texts appear more conservative than those of their more explicitly revolutionary female contemporaries. Another cause for this disinterest can be ascribed to a lingering reluctance to reshape the canon of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century literature in all three national literary traditions. The latter reason seems to be especially pertinent for understanding the exclusion of texts by women authors who dared retell Voltaire's Mahomet and Goethe's translation thereof, Johnson's Rasselas, Goethe's Werther, and Rousseau's Julie. This study uses close textual analysis and critical theory, especially psychoanalysis, feminism, and postcolonialism, to argue that, rather than being regressive, the perceived conservatism of these women writers was a strategic move that allowed them to introduce subversive ideas beneath the protective veil of relatively safe and non-controversial views. While the project of rewriting takes on different forms, sometimes it appears as an explicit contradiction of and sometimes as a careful modeling on their male predecessors' texts, the common ground for these four women was their careful negotiation of the opportunity to speak in a public forum and the risk that this publicity posed for a woman author during that time.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.
