Distribution of user-perceived usefulness of four presentation styles of opinion summarization

Sa, Ning; Yuan, Xiaojun; Begany, Grace; Yang, Huahai

Permalink

https://hdl.handle.net/2142/89402 Copy

Description

Title

Distribution of user-perceived usefulness of four presentation styles of opinion summarization

Author(s)

• Sa, Ning
• Yuan, Xiaojun
• Begany, Grace
• Yang, Huahai

Issue Date

2016-03-15

Keyword(s)

• opinion summarization
• usability
• presentation styles

Date of Ingest

2016-03-08T22:53:15Z

Abstract

In this study, four opinion summarization styles were compared under an experimental environment. Thirty four participants sorted thirty two cards into five usefulness categories. Every eight cards belong to one presentation style. It was found that the users spent the shortest time on cards in “not at all useful” category. The time of viewing “extremely useful” cards was also shorter than that of “somewhat useful”, “useful”, and “very useful” cards. This result can be explained with the components of the usefulness categories. Tag clouds and Aspect oriented sentiments needed less time to view. They are the major styles in “not at all useful” and “extremely useful”. Paragraph summaries and Group samples requested more time and they took at least 50% in “somewhat useful”, “useful”, and “very useful”. The findings are consistent with our previous results.

Publisher

iSchools

Series/Report Name or Number

IConference 2016 Proceedings

Type of Resource

text

Genre of Resource

Conference Poster

Language

eng

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/2142/89402

DOI

https://doi.org/10.9776/16576

Copyright and License Information

Copyright 2016 is held by the authors. Copyright permissions, when appropriate, must be obtained directly from the authors.

Owning Collections