Distribution of user-perceived usefulness of four presentation styles of opinion summarization
Sa, Ning; Yuan, Xiaojun; Begany, Grace; Yang, Huahai
Loading…
Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2142/89402
Description
Title
Distribution of user-perceived usefulness of four presentation styles of opinion summarization
Author(s)
Sa, Ning
Yuan, Xiaojun
Begany, Grace
Yang, Huahai
Issue Date
2016-03-15
Keyword(s)
opinion summarization
usability
presentation styles
Abstract
In this study, four opinion summarization styles were compared under an experimental environment. Thirty four participants sorted thirty two cards into five usefulness categories. Every eight cards belong to one presentation style. It was found that the users spent the shortest time on cards in “not at all useful” category. The time of viewing “extremely useful” cards was also shorter than that of “somewhat useful”, “useful”, and “very useful” cards. This result can be explained with the components of the usefulness categories. Tag clouds and Aspect oriented sentiments needed less time to view. They are the major styles in “not at all useful” and “extremely useful”. Paragraph summaries and Group samples requested more time and they took at least 50% in “somewhat useful”, “useful”, and “very useful”. The findings are consistent with our previous results.
Publisher
iSchools
Series/Report Name or Number
IConference 2016 Proceedings
Type of Resource
text
Language
eng
Permalink
http://hdl.handle.net/2142/89402
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9776/16576
Copyright and License Information
Copyright 2016 is held by the authors. Copyright permissions, when appropriate, must be obtained directly from the authors.
Use this login method if you
don't
have an
@illinois.edu
email address.
(Oops, I do have one)
IDEALS migrated to a new platform on June 23, 2022. If you created
your account prior to this date, you will have to reset your password
using the forgot-password link below.